Senate Budget and Taxation Committee

Education, Business and Administration Subcommittee

February 13, 2007

House Appropriations Committee

Education and Economic Development Subcommittee

February 14, 2007

University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science

FY 2008 Operating Budget

Testimony by

Donald F. Boesch, President

I am privileged once again to present for the General Assembly's consideration the Operating Budget request for the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science.  In this written testimony I briefly discuss the Center’s efforts in helping Maryland address the pressing environmental problems of the day as well as offer specific comments on the Department of Legislative Services’ review. 

This is the 17th Session in which I have represented the Center’s budget request before your subcommittee and I have greatly appreciated your interest in and support of the Center’s mission to conduct a comprehensive program of research, advisory services and education in environmental science—to develop a predictive ecology for Maryland.

We have presented you with a preview copy of the Center’s 2006 Annual Report, so I will not spend time reviewing our activities and accomplishments, rather I want to direct our attention forward to look at the role I believe UMCES can and should play in Maryland’s future.

Meeting Maryland’s Needs

The Grand Challenge

 

As we find ourselves continuing to work on long-standing environmental and natural resource problems, such as noncompliant air quality, contaminated harbor sediments, or reducing the harvest pressure on blue crabs, Maryland now confronts a daunting “grand challenge” for its environmental future.  We must simultaneously and harmoniously accelerate progress in restoring the Chesapeake Bay, manage even smarter growth to preserve the landscapes that make Maryland highly livable and economically prosperous, and begin to address climate change.  With a number of my UMCES colleagues I recently participated in preparing the transition report on environment and natural resources for the O’Malley-Brown Administration that develops the dimensions of this grand challenge further.  Let me just review for you the ways that the Center is contributing to the State’s efforts in meeting the grand challenge.

 

UMCES scientists are at the very forefront in improving our ability to objectively and clearly answer the question:  “how is the Bay doing?”  This is especially important in light of recent criticisms from the U. S. Government Accountability Office and federal inspectors general that found the Chesapeake Bay Program deficient in accounting for outcomes.  And, it will be essential as Governor O’Malley implements his BayStat concept.  With 2010 deadlines looming, my colleagues are also contributing to the identification of the most cost-effective measures to close the gap in meeting nutrient and sediment reduction goals.

 

So that we can achieve even smarter growth, UMCES scientists are furthering our knowledge of how development affects the health and function of our streams so that we can reduce the impact of development and effectively restore degraded streams.  We are developing and applying our understanding of how the important role of forests as habitats can be maintained in the face of their loss and fragmentation.  And, we are assessing the full costs of development, including those due to increased traffic and off-site development, on water quality and the achievement of our Bay Tributary Strategy Goals.

As you know, public understanding and concern about global warming have dramatically increased as the scientific consensus becomes even stronger that we are already on a trajectory of warmer temperatures, more intense rainfall, rising seas and, quite possibly, more intense tropical storms.  UMCES scientists are working hard to understand the consequences to Maryland and the Chesapeake Bay—how it will affect our fisheries, shorelines, and efforts to restore the Bay.  They are conducting research to understand the carbon cycle and the potential for mitigating more dramatic climate change by carbon sequestration as well as reductions of carbon dioxide emissions.  Our younger scientists and graduate students, in particular, are asking the question:  “what is our carbon footprint?”

Seamless Scientific Discovery, Integration and Application

 

A distinguishing feature of the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science is its combination of cutting-edge research, integration of complex information from many disciplines, and application of the resulting knowledge and information to the betterment of society and the environment that sustains it.  Our clients, reviewers and competitors tell us that few, if any, comparable institutions in the United States, or indeed elsewhere in the world, seamlessly combine scientific discovery, integration and application any better. 

 

I will offer three examples just to illustrate. 

 

Text Box:  The Center’s work in restoring native oysters has been highlighted in the news of late.  We are combining research on genetics, disease, nutrition, the oyster’s role as a filter and habitat, water currents that transport their larvae, and economic cost-effectiveness to improve our chances of success in rebuilding populations of this mollusc, for which our bay was named.  Because of our investment in culture facilities at our Horn Point Laboratory, we have been able to improve the efficiency and robustness of spawning and larval rearing that has allowed the rapid increase in disease-free oyster spat.  These spat are being deployed to restore oyster reefs in many parts of the Bay.  Last year, the Oyster Recovery Partnership was able to plant, as the DLS analysis notes, some 350 million of these spat, affixed to oyster shells to enhance their survival.  We have worked with the Department of Natural Resources to alleviate a bottleneck—the limited facilities in which to allow the larvae to “set” by attaching to shells—by designing a large setting facility at our pier at Horn Point, on the Choptank River.  Once completed, this will allow our spat-on-shell production to grow as much as six fold to 1 to 2 billion per year. 

 

Text Box:  This increased capacity is an essential component of the State’s native oyster restoration program.  The proposed Oyster Restoration Act included in the Governor’s legislative package would create a task force to design that program and work toward more effective management of the native oyster.

 

Text Box:  
Integrated metric for use in BayStat
As you heard in his State of the State address, Governor O’Malley is moving forward to the rapid deployment of BayStat, an application of performance management and measurement to all of our various Bay restoration efforts.  UMCES is building on its years of experience in understanding the functioning and dynamics of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem to develop the most effective indicators of Bay health.  We have been asked by the key agency secretaries to serve as both architect and honest broker in putting these indicators together with their metrics of program implementation and changing patterns and pressures on land to create the prototype of BayStat that we hope to present to the Governor and his staff within a couple of weeks. 

 

Text Box:  
Graduate student takes boring to determine tree age
Through a partnership with the federal agencies called the Chesapeake Watershed Cooperative Ecosystem Study Unit, UMCES is assessing the biodiversity of and threats to the extensive holdings of the National Park Service in the National Capital Region.  We have looked at everything from plants to bats and are integrating this information in ways that are useful to Park Service managers.  This has been so successful that we have been asked to apply these communication tools to park holdings throughout the country.  In addition, we are working with the Park Service to train and help retrain Maryland school teachers who are using the parks to improve environmental understanding and stewardship for their classes.

 

Innovative Graduate Education

 

As I always try to remind you, UMCES also plays a major role in teaching at a variety of levels.  In particular, we host over 100 masters and doctoral students working on graduate degrees at several USM campuses.  Most of our students are enrolled in the Graduate Program in Marine-Estuarine-Environmental Sciences (MEES)—the largest and most successful multi-institutional graduate program in the System.  Currently, UMCES faculty members are leading efforts to modernize the MEES Program so that we can ensure that our students are trained to deal with emerging environmental issues that they will face once they graduate.  In addition, we are expanding our efforts to offer graduate-level training activities for environmental professionals already in the workforce and are initiating a certificate program in Ecosystem Restoration Science.

 

 

The Operating Budget Request

 

Mandatory Costs

 

We are pleased and thankful that the Governor’s Allowance includes funds to meet our mandatory costs, including salary adjustments for merit, increased costs for health and retirement benefits, inflation for utility costs, project management fees and facilities renewal.  While most of the potential cost containment options identified for the University System of Maryland by the Department of Legislative Services (DLS) do not affect UMCES, a requirement to transfer an additional $9.3 million to the fund balance would essentially negate the resources provided to meet the mandatory cost increases.  I urge the subcommittee to consider Chancellor Kirwan’s reasoning as to why such a fund balance requirement is not needed and would be very detrimental at this time.

 

A Chesapeake Bay Research Vessel

 

The largest component of the funding increase for UMCES will go to debt service for a new Chesapeake Bay Research Vessel.  Here’s a brief background on this important effort.

 

The Center has been trying for years to acquire a new research vessel to replace its aging vessel, the R/V Aquarius.  Specially designed vessels are increasingly required for cutting-edge research and monitoring and, therefore, for the Bay scientific community to be competitive on a national scale.  Onboard acoustic devices that continually profile currents, sophisticated underway sensors of surface water properties and biota, and quiet engines that allow sonar surveys of fish are becoming standard requirements.  Suitable onboard laboratories with unvarying electrical power and clean conditions are required for sensitive, real-time analyses.  Special booms and winches are required to successfully deploy and retrieve instrument packages and autonomous underwater vehicles.  The interdisciplinary nature of modern estuarine science requires that teams of scientists, e.g. fishery biologists, plankton experts, and physicists, are out making measurements at the same time and place and have proper space to work and, frequently, stay aboard the vessel. 

 

These days, a research vessel is not just a platform, but is itself becoming a scientific instrument.  What is needed then is a next-generation coastal research vessel appropriate to the Chesapeake Bay:  one that is scientifically advanced and more capable of accommodating scientists and their modern instruments, but more economical to operate than the new cohort of larger research vessels from other Atlantic states.  Cost-efficiency of operations is as important as technical sophistication.  UMCES is planning to fill this requirement by constructing and then operating a multipurpose, 21st Century Chesapeake Bay research vessel as a resource not only for its own scientists but shared with other research institutions and state and federal agencies. 

Text Box:  
Concept for the Chesapeake Bay Research Vessel
The Center is undertaking the design and construction of a new research vessel of approximately 80 ft in overall length that can be operated by two crew members (thus reducing a major operating cost).  It will have:  at least 125 sq ft of laboratory space; onboard computers and integrated data logging systems; built-in sensors and acoustic transducers for continuous measurements while underway; electronic winches with hard-wire connections to all science spaces; low stack emissions and acoustically quiet operations; the ability to place on deck a small “science van” (e.g. for a clean laboratory); and a stern A-frame with the capacity of launching and retrieving data buoys and other equipment weighing up to 10,000 pounds.  It will have bunks to accommodate four scientists for up to five days, be capable of carrying 40 day passengers (e.g. students on field trips), and meet or exceed all applicable safety standards. 

UMCES has engaged a marine architect experienced in research vessel design, to develop the conceptual design of the vessel and supervise construction.  Bids for a design/build contract are expected in March 2007, with construction to begin soon thereafter.  The construction is being financed under Maryland’s State Master Lease Program, to which UMCES and the University System of Maryland (USM) are committed pay back over a 10 year period

 

The Department of Legislative Services Analysis

 

The DLS analysis highlights one major trend and presents three recommendations to which I would like to respond. 

 

The major trend concerns the fact that the number of large grant awards was below the MFR goal and at a five year low.  First, we set an ambitious goal that we will be challenged to achieve in any case.  Secondly, a number of factors underlie the drop in large awards.  This includes the tightening of federal budgets for competitive research programs in environmental science because of Bush Administration priorities, excessive earmarking of appropriations that have decreased the competitive funding pool, increasing proposal pressure, and a transition within the UMCES faculty ranks to more junior faculty members who have filled vacancies from departing or retiring senior faculty members.  In our experience it takes two to three years for even highly successful junior faculty members to attract significant external research funding.

 

As I mentioned earlier the Oyster Cultivation Facilities at Horn Point is being designed to dramatically increase our capacity to produce spat-on-shell for use in the State’s native oyster restoration program.  We will soon be ready to go to construction, but the project has been delayed for two years in the Capital Improvement Program.  Recognizing the key role this facility must play, Speaker Busch and the Governor’s Office are now searching for ways that this can be included in the FY 2008 Capital Budget.  So, I would urge your deferral of any decision to reduce the $117,500 in operating funds until that matter is resolved later in the session.

 

I urge you not to include the language recommended that would require UMCES to direct 50% of indirect cost recoveries from new research grants to pay debt service on the State Master Lease Program for the research vessel.  A precise level of grants related directly to the new vessel would be next to impossible to ascertain and these indirect cost recoveries are required to meet the real operational costs incurred in supporting the research at our laboratories.

 

I also have concerns about recommended language restricting the appropriation for no other purpose than the repayment of the master lease.  UMCES will incur additional expenses associated with the operation and mooring of the new research vessel.  In the event the total appropriation was not needed to repay the master lease, UMCES intends to use the limited balance to support berthing costs at the Chesapeake Biological Laboratory. 

 

Audit Findings

 

When an agency has many audit findings, including repeat findings, the DLS analysis and the agency response receives prominent attention.  Little is said about a clean audit.  In our recently completed Legislative Audit there was one minor finding which has been easily addressed and no repeat findings.  The Center prides itself in its record of effective management reflected in this audit report.  I have commended the UMCES staff members that work so diligently to successfully meet the challenge of maintaining appropriate controls and separation of duties when there is little or no redundancy in staffing.

 

Return to Previous Page